<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thinking side-wise &#187; wisdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidewise.biz/tag/wisdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidewise.biz</link>
	<description>A side-wise view of business and the enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 11:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ten ways to fail &#8211; and how to avoid them</title>
		<link>http://sidewise.biz/2009/08/ten-failures-to-avoid/</link>
		<comments>http://sidewise.biz/2009/08/ten-failures-to-avoid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidewise.biz/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Success often arises just from avoiding failure. For example, consider the &#8216;ten commandments for business failure&#8216; listed by former Coca-Cola CEO Don Keough:
&#8220;You will fail if you quit taking risks, are inflexible, isolated, assume infallibility, play the game close to the line, don’t take time to think, put all your faith in outside experts, love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Success often arises just from avoiding failure. For example, consider the &#8216;<a title="Amazon - 'Ten Commandments for Business Failure'" href="http://www.amazon.com/Ten-Commandments-Business-Failure/dp/B001LF4AS6/" target="_blank">ten commandments for business failure</a>&#8216; listed by former Coca-Cola CEO Don Keough:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You will fail if you quit taking risks, are inflexible, isolated, assume infallibility, play the game close to the line, don’t take time to think, put all your faith in outside experts, love your bureaucracy, send mixed messages, and fear the future.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This list has been used, for example, to summarise current <a title="Times - 'NHS Business Failure'" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/public_sector/article6733624.ece" target="_blank">operational and strategic problems in Britain&#8217;s National Health Service</a> (though that specific example does perhaps prioritise political point-scoring over practical review). But if we <em><strong>think side-wise</strong></em>, we can also re-use these known &#8216;anti-patterns&#8217; for failure as pointers to strategies for business success:</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #1</em>: Stop taking risks</strong> &#8211; How do you make it safe for people to take risks? How do your people know when risks are appropriate, and when not? What &#8217;safe-fail&#8217; fallback mechanisms could you use to enable people to take safer risks?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #2</em>: Be inflexible</strong> &#8211; All those rules and regulations may seem to give little room for manoeuvre, but there are always <em>some</em> options for choice, for chance, for innovation: what are they? How can you use those chances to enhance your organisation&#8217;s ability to adapt to changing business contexts and conditions?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #3</em>: Isolate yourself</strong> &#8211; Management hidden away in a bunker, no-one talking to anyone else: many corporations have killed themselves that way. What do <em>you</em> do to ensure you know what&#8217;s going on, both inside and outside the organisation?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #4</em>: Assume infallibility</strong> &#8211; Often a problem of arrogance, this one: Enron&#8217;s high-flyers famously described themselves as &#8220;<a title="Wikipedia on 'The smartest guys in the room'" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron:_The_Smartest_Guys_in_the_Room" target="_blank">the smartest guys in the room</a>&#8220;. Instead, what can <em>you</em> do to ensure that you follow <a title="Cromwell's Rule" href="http://understandinguncertainty.org/node/97" target="_blank">Cromwell&#8217;s Rule</a>, the exhortation of the English Civil War leader and general Oliver Cromwell to &#8220;think it possible you may be mistaken&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #5</em>: Play the game close to the foul line</strong> &#8211; <a title="Wikipedia on Enron and California energy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_electricity_crisis" target="_blank">Enron</a> again provides all too many examples of this, such as its &#8216;Death Star&#8217;, &#8216;Ricochet&#8217;, &#8216;Fat Boy&#8217; and other scams through which they stole over $11bn by &#8216;gaming&#8217; the US West Coast electricity market. The short-term gains are invariably outweighed by the long-term losses &#8211; or long jail-sentences&#8230; So <a title="Wikipedia on corporate social responsibility" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility" target="_blank">corporate social responsibility</a> isn&#8217;t a &#8216;feel-good&#8217; fad: as <a title="Wikipedia on Deming '14 points'" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming#Dr._W._Edward_Deming.27s_14_points" target="_self">Deming</a>, <a title="Shell General Business Principles" href="http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell/who_we_are/our_values/sgbp/sgbp_30032008.html" target="_blank">Shell</a> and others have demonstrated, it&#8217;s an essential survival strategy, especially in the longer term. We need to be clear about our own business-principles &#8211; and stick to them.</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #6</em>: Don&#8217;t take time to think</strong> &#8211; In present-day business, the pressure&#8217;s always on, always pushing us to do more with less. One of the first things to get sacrificed when it all gets too much is time to think, time to reflect. But if we don&#8217;t take the time to think about what we&#8217;re doing, and why, we&#8217;re likely to find ourselves running full-tilt into a dead-end, powering over the proverbial cliff. Simple techniques such as the <a title="Wikipedia on After Action Review" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Action_Review" target="_blank">After-Action Review</a> can make a huge difference: so by what means can <em>you</em> help shift the mindset from &#8220;We don&#8217;t have time to do this stuff!&#8221; to &#8220;We don&#8217;t have time to <em>not</em> do this stuff!&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #7</em>: Put too much faith in outside experts</strong> &#8211; Often a corollary of Failures #3, #4 and #6: hiding in a corner and using blameable &#8216;outsiders&#8217; to do our thinking for us&#8230; Consultants and contractors do have their roles, especially in helping us avoid falling into &#8216;<a title="Wikipedia on Groupthink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink" target="_blank">groupthink</a>&#8216;, but as Deming also demonstrated, the most important sources of information are usually within the business itself, especially those close to the everyday action. What can <em>you</em> do to to build the right balance between &#8216;outside&#8217; and &#8216;inside&#8217;? What <em>you</em> do to <a title="Creating innovation culture at Tata Motors" href="http://frontendofinnovation.blogspot.com/2009/08/creating-innovation-culture.html" target="_blank">create an innovation culture</a> within the business?</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #8</em>: Love your bureaucracy</strong> &#8211; Bureaucracies do have a real business function, providing &#8216;normal&#8217; paths for business communication, to guide, monitor and manage. But whenever we try to use them as a means of <em>control</em> in business, they grow and grow like an out-of-control cancer that kills communication and creativity, and eventually the organisation itself. Direction is real, but control is a myth: it doesn&#8217;t exist. So monitor the monitors, cut away all those meaningless measures, kill off pointless reports that no-one reads: rein in that bureaucracy, and never let it grow without a clear, explicit, &#8216;on-purpose&#8217; business reason.</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #9</em>: Send mixed messages</strong> &#8211; Social networks and increased scrutiny mean that mixed-messages will not only be spotted, but may well be interpreted as &#8216;playing the game close to the foul line&#8217; &#8211; see Failure #5 &#8211; with serious impacts on risk and reputation. One of the best ways to keep consistent on message is to be clear about the linkage between <a title="Slidepack - 'Vision, Role, Mission, Goal'" href="http://www.slideshare.net/tetradian/vision-role-mission-goal-a-framework-for-business-motivation" target="_blank">vision, role, mission and goal</a> &#8211; and to have a clear and meaningful business-vision in the first place!</p>
<p><strong><em>Failure #10</em>: Fear the future</strong> &#8211; This one is often the real driver behind other &#8216;commandments&#8217; to failure, especially Failures #1 and #8. Formal futures techniques such as <a title="Wikipedia on Scenario-analysis" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scenario_planning" target="_blank">business scenarios</a>, <a title="Wikipedia on Environmental scanning" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_scanning" target="_blank">environmental scanning</a> and <a title="Wikipedia on Causal Layered Analysis" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_layered_analysis" target="_blank">causal layered analysis</a> will help to ease those fears &#8211; and guide your organisation with what will always be an inherently uncertain future.</p>
<p>How much are <em>you</em> at risk of setting up your business for failure? Turn it round: use this list above to set it up for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sidewise.biz/2009/08/ten-failures-to-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8217;side-wise&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://sidewise.biz/2009/07/why-sidewise/</link>
		<comments>http://sidewise.biz/2009/07/why-sidewise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidewise.biz/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conventional business wisdom is easy to find: in the library, on the internet, the blogs and the business journals, from the academics or the big consultancies, or from colleagues in the club or pub. But mostly it&#8217;s the same old wisdom: it works as long as everything stays the same as it always did.
Which it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conventional business wisdom is easy to find: in the library, on the internet, the blogs and the business journals, from the academics or the big consultancies, or from colleagues in the club or pub. But mostly it&#8217;s the same old wisdom: it works as long as everything stays the same as it always did.</p>
<p>Which it doesn&#8217;t; so it doesn&#8217;t. Which is a problem.</p>
<p>Sometimes what&#8217;s needed most is <em>un</em>conventional wisdom: to quote a certain well-known scientist, a problem cannot be solved by the same thinking that caused that problem in the first place. To get out of a loop, a rut, we need to be able to jump sideways. Or, more particularly, <strong><em>think side-wise</em></strong>.</p>
<p>So every culture has had its side-wise thinkers: the maverick, the court-jester, the formal legal role of &#8216;devil&#8217;s advocate&#8217; &#8211; the valued insider-outsiders who counter the otherwise inevitable &#8217;stuckness&#8217; and groupthink. Literally eccentric, aside from the centre, yet able to apply side-wise leverage to help the world turn the right way up. And it&#8217;s the same with our world: present-day business needs <strong>side-wise thinking</strong> to guide innovation and adaptation, to keep abreast and ahead of continual change.</p>
<p>Some of that &#8216;wisdom from the side&#8217; may seem random at first, but it has its own definite discipline &#8211; the discipline of the generalist, weaving connecting threads across every other discipline and silo. So as well as identifying and annotating some of the new ideas and innovations coming side-wise down the track, one key aim of this site is to explore that deeper discipline of side-wise thinking &#8211; how to do it, why to do it, what to do (and not do), when and where to use it (and not use it), how to monitor and measure its impact and value.</p>
<p>So return here often for new ideas, new information &#8211; we trust you&#8217;ll find it of real value to your and your business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sidewise.biz/2009/07/why-sidewise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
